Basset Hounds Forum banner

Murder Hollow compromise reached

2447 Views 6 Replies 3 Participants Last post by  Mikey T (link to Amy Worden's Philly Dawg site and article)


"Animal-cruelty charges filed against a woman known for running a successful pack of sporting dogs have been continued until June and will be dropped if she complies with an agreement to clean and maintain her kennel in Roxborough."

"ONeill said from the bench that Willard must install a drainage system, keep her property reasonably free from feces, repair the kennel ceiling, change standing water the dogs drink from at least once a day, and have the dogs checked for parasites."

"ONeill also sharply criticized reported Internet death threats made against animal-control officers for the raid on Willards property."You should contact animal people", ONeill said to Willard, "and tell them that this matter is resolved."

( follow link and see January 13th post )
1 - 3 of 7 Posts
I noticed a picture has been added to the article I linked- I'm assuming it's one of the dogs in question; looks like it's tick-infested. I'd be interested in seeing more pictures of kennel /dog conditions at the time the PSPCA visited Murder Hollow last summer.

Edited to add the following:
Amy Worden just added the following caption to the photo I mentioned above:

"The picture above shows one of the Bassets found at Willard's kennel. Look closely at those little black dots on the dog's face, those are ticks. PSPCA officers say all the dogs in Willard's kennel were covered in ticks and some were suffering from Lyme Disease. Many had severe cases of parasites too."
Well, I've felt from the start that this sad case was being used to push an agenda. Sentiments in Pennsylvania run hot when it comes to dog law and enforcement. After a long and bitter battle, Pennsylvania now has the toughest anti puppymill law in the country, and there are alot of folks who are not happy with it.

In my opinion, the same groups who opposed the new dog law legislation welcomed this case as a way to legally challenge the dog laws in the Commomwealth. Buckshot's Nov 17th post "Update: Murder Hollow Bassets" quotes Julian Prager :"A full win on this will overturn the mandatory spay neuter laws for anyone having over 4 dogs in Philadelphia and eliminate the arbitrary limit laws there. This would establish a precedent based on constitutional grounds and will be useful in fighting these laws in jurisdictions across the country."

The administrator on another forum, Bassethound Town Hall, has been following this case from the start, and posted the following which she found on Facebook a few days ago. I think it's worth a read.

"Silver Eagle Bassets statement:
Throughout the course of events following the seizure of the Murder Hollow hounds last summer, we have maintained the position that this was not a challenge to hounds and hunting in general, as has been vigorously portrayed in internet blogs, but an isolated incident related to particular facts. We have refrained from citing specifics, because the legal game is what it is, and perhaps continues beyond the settlement reached in court on Tuesday, January 12, 2010.
Nevertheless, it is time to report our own experience with the SPCA. Several weeks ago, two officers from the Chester County SPCA arrived at our door in response to a complaint of "unsanitary conditions" in our kennel. We were happy to show them our healthy and fit hounds, our ample and clean exercise areas, a warm place to spend the night and up to date health records. The officers assured us that everything was in order and that there was no basis for the complaint.
In a follow-up call the next day, which we made at the recommendation of our local police department, the officer again assured us that our kennel was "exemplary" and our record keeping "fantastic". If there were further complaints we would be notified but that there was certainly no need for a second visit.
Our experience with the SPCA and its officers was not confrontational, and we never had the impression that they were going beyond the scope of their duties to enforce animal welfare. Although they have a duty of confidentiality to the complainant, we have a pretty good idea that it was related to the Murder Hollow defense and the effort to raise money by using fear tactics. (Interestingly, the judge chided the defendant for death threats to the PSPCA officer delivered over the internet, saying he understood it probably wasn't her doing, but that her supporters needed to be reined in!)
We have said from the beginning that the important thing should be the welfare of the hounds. As seen in the terms of the settlement, apparently the judge thought so too. Although the organizations which rallied to the Murder Hollow defense financially have not yet commented, and further legal action on the larger issues of constitutionality might yet be filed, the scare tactics to raise money for that may have lost some of their force. Hopefully now cooler heads will prevail, and we can turn our attention to chasing rabbits and enjoying the sport we love. HARK TO 'EM.!"

(Edited to add quote in 2nd paragraph)
See less See more
1 - 3 of 7 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.