![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 5,234
|
Oklahoma is quickly becoming one of the most popular sites for puppy mills and, a few months ago, some excellent legislation was written to put a stop to what is becoming a huge problem in the state. Unfortunately, the bill died today in the state house: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: southcentral Pa.
Posts: 2,235
|
Biscuit-I don't know if you've been following my posts in the Politics Forum on whart is going on in Pennsylvania regarding legislation aimed at shutting down the puppymills:
To summarize: sportsmen's groups and some small kennel owners have objected to the pending legislation saying it would hurt them- it looks like the proposals are back on the drawing board- in the meantime, Gov. Rendell who is backing the effort to shut down the mills has stepped up enforcement. I'll keep posting about the Pa. situation as it unfolds, and will post a link to the new proposals when they are put forth- I would be interested to hear if the fight will continue in Oklahoma past this failed attempt. In Pa., the fact that the governor wants the mills shut down is a huge help in this battle- |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: new mexico
Posts: 1,196
|
This is very sad news. I've been following the OK bill and had hopes that the legislators would do the right thing. Guess the money from the millers is too much of a temptation.
I get so mad when they use the excuse that the USDA already regulates these mills. What a bunch of bs. A mill might be visited once a year and the USDA doesn't do much beyond write reports. So many good people in OK are supporting this leglislation - I am sure they will keep trying.
__________________
Chris Foodslave, chauffer & doorperson to Elvis, Georgia, Ginger & Maggie, Crissy & Dart |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
It is very difficult/impossible to craft legislation to regulate puppymills with out having some adverse effect on hobby breaders, and hunting packs. Especial when a lot of the initial legislation is put forth by groups like PETA and HSUS that would like to see all breeding and animal being kept as pets be abolished in the first place. They use such legislation in the guise to regulate puppymills knowing full well it effect much more than just that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Glen Moore, Pa. U.S.A.
Posts: 797
|
Many of these new regulations are written by people who don't have a clue about hunting dogs, sled dogs or any activity involving dogs. It is very difficult to define the difference between puppy mills and some of the legitimate breeders.
Just because a man has 20 beagles, don't label him a puppy mill. I will admit that the beagles are not pampered, but they are kept in good, clean conditions with adequate food shelter and medical care. One proposed law from Philadelphia would ban the use of logging chain for use on dogs. No definintion fo logging chain. That was most likely written as a show for the locals. Another would ban keeping dogs on wire. Most hunting beagles are in kennels with at least partial wire floor. Easier to clean, and the dogs have no problem with wire. the bill was meant to stop puppy mill operations where the cages are stacked and waste can drop down on the lower dog. Most states already have laws that could be used to control puppy mills, but lack manpower to enforce them. new laws will not help,if they also are not enforced I would suggest you check the details of these bills before you decide if they are realistic or not. One bill required a run of about 100 sq. foot-- same size for a papillion or an Irish wolf hound. One required a certain amount of shade for the dog, but the shadow of the dog house didn't count. one bill would ban any home medical treatment -- no flea and tick control, no tooth brushing, no pills of any kind. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: southcentral Pa.
Posts: 2,235
|
Quote:
Quote:
Revisons to the original proposals are being worked on now- I'll keep posting in the Politics Forum as this unfolds- |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 5,234
|
Then maybe hunters need to get themselves involved in the legislation - and *not* to shut it down.
Look, I'm surrounded by hunters and hunting dogs here. While the rest of you all were running for the subway or whatever this morning, I was greeted by three hunters in an old pickup with hounds in the back passing my place when I walked out to leave for the day. Everyone here has beagles or coonhounds or (God forbid) *Jack Russell Terriers* ::shudder::, and there's guns going off day and night. And I have to say, I don't know a hunter who would worry about being confused with this: Quote:
I'm no fan of PETA, but this legislation wasn't written by PETA, and we have very real problems here that are getting bigger by the day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 5,234
|
BTW, I don't mean to bark at you, Dean and Mikey. It's not you all I'm annoyed with.
I just find it incredibly frustrating that such horrific conditions are being allowed to proliferate here, and our state gov't doesn't even bat an eye. Yeesh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The problem is rarely is legislation the best solution to any problem. While not easy Education of the consumer is IMHO a better route. The other thing is if it is the condition at the mill that people are concerned about, the deplorable condition all prosecution under animal cruelity laws and don't need to involve any aditional legislation at all only enforcement. As alway an legislation without enforcement is useless hich just goes to show why most legislative means are of themselves useless to solve porblems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 5,234
|
I know that's a trendy opinion these days, but it's untrue. Yes, it's possible to cherry-pick and find examples where legislation has failed, but ...
Do speed limits work? Are speed limits an important way to moderate the behavior of people who feel entirely justified to go 70 mph through residential and school zones? Should we have legislation and rules governing the behavior of teachers? Should teachers in middle schools be free to form intimate relationships with their 13 and 14 year old charges if the fancy hits them? Should 11 year olds be free to purchase alcohol and drive without a license? Etc.? There isn't a culture or society - or even a known community - on earth where behavior is regulated through whatever legislation that culture or society - or community - employs. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|