![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cassville,N.J.
Posts: 936
|
Courthouse News Service Billy Milko
__________________
</font>[list]<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 1,969
|
Yeah, but found this too. i'm gonna reserve judgment 'cause i really don't know. but it seems there is some controversy out there about this situation, enough controversy that I can't really take a side. there are a number of vocal dog owners who are upset about BHCA's support of this woman and the situation here, and don't see it as a conspiracy to "take away her dogs." in fact, one of the woman's neighbors complained about her-- that is how she got the attention of the authorities. that she complied w/the what needed to be done, that is what resulted in them dropping the charges, that's the way I read it-- not that they dropped the charges because they weren't valid. also, i know bassets get old, but that pic shows black things on its face. I don't know what it is, but doesn't look only like old age to me.
Her lawsuit argues that the barn is exempt from the rules, but it looks like the D.A disagrees, and feels it does not meet zoning requirements. UPDATE: The PA dog docket: breeder lawsuit, kennel owner charges dismissed | Philly Dawg | 10/18/2010 i'm not saying the above is a great or unbiased article either, but the article from "Courthouse News Service," first calls her a breeder, then says she does not sell dogs, then says she's raised 17 litters, then goes to say she didn't sell them, she gave them away (?)... really?... then there was another post earlier that said that she is not a breeder. doesn't add up and there are contradictions here... anyways.
__________________
see what the Worm is up to: http://bassetworm.blogspot.com/ Last edited by Wworm; 07-22-2011 at 02:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 838
|
Quote:
![]() What a shocking thing to do to someone's Bassets!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||
|
Senior Member
|
Sophie For Billy et.al. That have been following the case it has be always in the "political" forum I doubt he saw or read your Threac so he was providing an update that the suit against PASPCA is going forward.
Quote:
Quote:
There is no contridictions if you understand the situation. Quote:
So we have the manner of exceeding of the Philly County Limit on dogs. keep in mind the bonderies of the county of Philly is the same as the city. Any First year law student could rip the County's case to shreads on whether a violation occur. There is no provission for penalties under the law, and certainly you would not expect anything but a police state to give the ultimatium of hand over 12 dogs or we take all of them. That is the question why was she not given either the time to contest the charges or find suitable homes for the dog. but it is the SOP for the PASPCA if you don't believe me look at other cases I have cited in previous thread on this case. Quote:
Quote:
If you look at this case as a single incident it is possible to conclude that there is not a problem with the PASPCA but if you look at all the cases including the problem at the PASPCA run shelter. The politics involved in taking over the Policing and animal shelters of Philly and one can only conclude that the org does not have the best interest of PA citizens at its core. Quote:
Quote:
I highly reccommend that anyone interested in the true facts of the case do the research, look at previous lawsuits brought against PASPCA and I think they will reach the same conclusion I did. there is a very troubling pattern of behavior by the PASPCA using threat and intimidation to get people to Voluntarily surrender animals along with a host of other rouge behavior. If the Murder Hollow case were a single incident I perfectly understand giving the "trusted athorities" the benefit of the doubt, but when a pattern of behavior emerges , when PASPCA officer say they were specifical trained to use these tactic especial when working outside areas that that particular officer had legal athority, that benefit of the doubt evaporates very quickly for me anyway. Last edited by Mikey T; 07-22-2011 at 03:08 PM. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
Even ignoring that evidence, there's no denying a woman was abused by a bunch of self-righteous morons with too much power and little accountability. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|