Corruption Exposed - Basset Hounds: Basset Hound Dog Forums
Basset.net is the premier Basset Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-31-2008, 06:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
murraysmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: southcentral Pa.
Posts: 2,235
Default

More on Almost Heaven:

http://www.mcall.com/news/columnists/all-5...,4871613.column

Quote:

"Dog Law supervisor Richard Martrich, the Eckhart friend who conducted many of the kennel's inspections over the years and who also helped give the agency's seal of approval to the hellish Limestone Kennels in Chester County, has been transferred to the state Bureau of Weights and Measures.

Dog Law spokesman Chris Ryder said the department's probe into the Limestone Kennels situation was completed with the Martrich transfer. The other warden who inspected the place with him, Maureen Siddons, has returned to active duty, he said.

Meanwhile, the state inspector general's office is conducting an independent investigation into the Dog Law Bureau and the Almost Heaven situation, in which inspections routinely came back clean despite continuing horror stories from customers and rescue groups.

Ryder said the inspector general's investigators are looking specifically at whether Eckhart was tipped off before his inspections. Nelson said PSPCA is cooperating with that probe.

Finally, many people have asked what they can do to help with the dogs that have been removed from Almost Heaven as a result of the PSPCA raid.

In the broadest sense, maybe the most important thing you can do is to stop buying dogs from pet stores.

Most pet store dogs come from puppy mills, which not only means you're rolling the dice about your new dog's condition, but that you're providing financial support for the animal cruelty that has distinguished Pennsylvania's sordid puppy mill tradition."
murraysmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-31-2008, 03:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Elvismom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: new mexico
Posts: 1,196
Default

"Almost Heaven" is definitely a misnomer. Those poor animals - I hope that rescues etc. can be found to take them. I went to his website and was totally shocked at what he charges for his "rescue" animals - I'm bettng a lot of them are breeding "stock" that he just wants to get rid of.

I hope the animal cruelty convictions stick and that he faces both fines and jail time. I don't know how the PA law reads, but I sincerely hope that he is required to find homes, shelters or rescues for his animals and is allowed to kill them. He sounds like scum.
__________________
Chris
Foodslave, chauffer & doorperson to Elvis, Georgia, Ginger & Maggie, Crissy & Dart
Elvismom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 04:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
murraysmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: southcentral Pa.
Posts: 2,235
Default

Elvismom-

Quote fron article:

"Eckhart also appealed Dog Law's revocation of his kennel license. That case will be heard in Harrisburg Nov. 13. If he loses the case and doesn't appeal further, he'll be given a set amount of time to dispose of his dogs."

If he loses and has to dispose of his dogs, he is not allowed to personally kill them - THANKS TO THE NEW DOG LAW:

Prior to this he would have been allowed to shoot them, as did the Reading puppymill owners who slaughtered 80 dogs back in late summer because they were being required to get rid of the dogs' fleas. It was easier and cheaper for them to shoot their kennel dogs than to buy Frontline. Under the new law, only a vet can euathanize a puppymill dog.


The above incident went a long way in getting the current legislation passed- people finally saw the horrors that could be inflicted on dogs LEGALLY in this state.


Hopefully most of the Almost Heaven dogs will be taken by rescues:according to the article I posted Oct. 4th about this raid, "Some of the scores of dogs and cats seized from Derbe ''Skip'' Eckhart's Almost Heaven kennel are already up for adoption through the Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Philadelphia, and many more are expected to be available after they receive medical treatment and behavioral rehabilitation.''
murraysmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2008, 09:57 AM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Elvismom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: new mexico
Posts: 1,196
Default

Thank doG he can't kill them. And I sure hope he loses his appeal and they shut him down. Now if we could only keep him from opening another kennel somewhere else.... But, I'll take the small victories when they come our way.

Now I'll pray for furever homes for each one of those canine victims. I hope they can all live out their lives with loving humans.

Thanks for all the postings you do on what's happening in PA. I hope that other states follow their example.
__________________
Chris
Foodslave, chauffer & doorperson to Elvis, Georgia, Ginger & Maggie, Crissy & Dart
Elvismom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2008, 08:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cassville,N.J.
Posts: 936
Default

he can't kill them but a vet can. i was spending the weekend in pennsylvania this weekend and the people i were with said the law hasn't passed yet cause it wasn't signed yet.is this true? Billy Milko ok now i just did a little research and saw where some else said it was signed by the Gov. of Pa on Oct.9th,but did it take effect right than?
__________________
</font>[list]<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
pinehawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 12:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mikey T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: West Warrwick, RI
Posts: 7,724
Send a message via Yahoo to Mikey T
Default

Quote:
he can't kill them but a vet can. i was spending the weekend in pennsylvania this weekend and the people i were with said the law hasn't passed yet cause it wasn't signed yet.is this true? Billy Milko ok now i just did a little research and saw where some else said it was signed by the Gov. of Pa on Oct.9th,but did it take effect right than?[/b]

Most parts do not go in effect until 60 days after signing however the sections on comercial kennel requirement do not go in effect for a year because most of the regulation is not even written and is dependant on a animal welfare committe that has not even ben formed. There are a few sections with talk effect imeadiately one being that any anmimal siezed or held as part of the regulatory process can only be euthanized by a Vet. At one time the law required state notification and permission for even a vet to euthanized but under the current regulation a vet can euthanize first for the comfort and well being of the animal and notify the state after,


link to pased verision of HB 2525
Quote:
(1) THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL TAKE EFFECT IN ONE <--
15 YEAR:
16 (I) THE ADDITION OF SECTION 207(H)(1) THROUGH (16)
17 OF THE ACT.
18 (II) EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH (2)(II), THE
19 ADDITION OF SECTION 207(I) OF THE ACT.
20 (2) THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS SHALL TAKE EFFECT
21 IMMEDIATELY:
22 (I) THE ADDITION OF SECTION 207(H)(17) AND (18) OF
23 THE ACT.
24 (II) THE ADDITION OF SECTION 207(I)(6)(X)( AND (J)
25 OF THE ACT.
26 (III) THE ADDITION OF SECTION 221 OF THE ACT.
27 (IV) THIS SECTION.
28 (3) The remainder of this act shall take effect in 60
29 days.[/b]
Michael Tefts
Mikey T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 08:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
murraysmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: southcentral Pa.
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
he can't kill them but a vet can. i was spending the weekend in pennsylvania this weekend[/b]
Yes, but euthanization by a vet is alot more expensive than a box of bullets- so if they want to stay legal, another cheap option is contacting rescues or the SPCA. (Or maybe get out of the business all together because of higher costs.)

Under this new law medical procedures are still not required to be performed by a vet- puppymillers can still do lots of things including c-sections( which are often performed without anesthesia in filthy conditions, among other horrors which I won't list here) Next year H.B. 2532, which would put an end to this, comes up for consideration.

Hope you had a nice weekend up here- Paul and I bagged 18 more bags of leaves but the weather was gorgeous-

Thanks for posting the link, Mike.
murraysmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 11:16 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mikey T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: West Warrwick, RI
Posts: 7,724
Send a message via Yahoo to Mikey T
Default

Quote:
Yes, but euthanization by a vet is alot more expensive than a box of bullets- so if they want to stay legal, another cheap option is contacting rescues or the SPCA. (Or maybe get out of the business all together because of higher costs.)[/b]

Um law does not provide for that option explictly only if that meansd of divestment is in the CEASE AND DESIST order,
Quote:
I) IMMEDIATELY CEASE AND DESIST FROM OPERATING A
24 KENNEL, INCLUDING BOARDING, BUYING, EXCHANGING, SELLING,
25 OFFERING FOR SALE, GIVING AWAY OR IN ANY WAY TRANSFERRING
26 DOGS.

...(III) NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE
6 EUTHANIZATION OF ANY DOG. NO DOG MAY BE EUTHANIZED UNLESS
7 IT IS DETERMINED BY A VETERINARIAN THAT THE EUTHANASIA
8 WILL PREVENT THE DOG FROM SUFFERING CAUSED BY A MEDICAL
9 CONDITION. IF A VETERINARIAN DETERMINES A DOG SHOULD BE
10 EUTHANIZED, A COPY OF THE VETERINARIAN'S FINDINGS, SIGNED
11 BY THE VETERINARIAN, MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT.
12 THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH DO NOT APPLY TO AN
13 EMERGENCY SITUATION IF IT IS DEEMED BY THE VETERINARIAN
14 THAT IMMEDIATE EUTHANASIA IS NECESSARY TO RELIEVE THE
15 SUFFERING OF THE DOG. FOLLOWING EUTHANASIA IN AN
16 EMERGENCY SITUATION, A COPY OF THE VETERINARIAN'S FINDING
17 MUST BE SIGNED BY THE VETERINARIAN AND PROVIDED TO THE
18 DEPARTMENT.

...DIVEST OF ALL DOGS NUMBERING OVER 25, UNLESS
24 DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE DEPARTMENT ORDER, WITHIN A
25 REASONABLE TIME PERIOD AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT,
26 BUT NOT TO EXCEED TEN DAYS. THE DEPARTMENT'S ORDER SHALL
27 SET FORTH THE MANNER BY WHICH THE KENNEL OWNER MAY DIVEST
28 OF THE DOGS.[/b]
so dog may be only given to whom the dog law bureau say's it is ok to.


Michael Tefts



...
Mikey T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 12:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
murraysmom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: southcentral Pa.
Posts: 2,235
Default

"Hopefully most of the Almost Heaven dogs will be taken by rescues:according to the article I posted Oct. 4th about this raid, "Some of the scores of dogs and cats seized from Derbe ''Skip'' Eckhart's Almost Heaven kennel are already up for adoption through the Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Philadelphia, and many more are expected to be available after they receive medical treatment and behavioral rehabilitation.''

That quote is from my second post in this thread- in truth, local organizations have a history of taking discarded dogs-
and of course, that's not a good option because these organizations are already overwhelmed with unwanted pets.

It's a bad situation all around: there are no good solutions for these dogs. That's why the puppymill business needs to be shut down.

And that's why, as a resident of Lancaster County, which has some of the worst hell-hole puppymills in the United States, I supported the legislation and stand by it.

All I can say to you and others who have opposed it for whatever reasons, is to give it a chance.
murraysmom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 01:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mikey T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: West Warrwick, RI
Posts: 7,724
Send a message via Yahoo to Mikey T
Default

Quote:
All I can say to you and others who have opposed it for whatever reasons, is to give it a chance.[/b]
A law that does not address why puppymills exist in the first place. Places much more stingrent requirments on locations that breed pupies than sell them Why?

then again the major provision of the bill still need to be worked out and won't take effect for at least three years so it will be a long wait
Michael Tefts
Mikey T is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
PetGuide.com
Basset.net DobermanTalk.com GoldenRetrieverForum.com OurBeagleWorld.com
BoxerForums.com DogForums.com GoPitbull.com PoodleForum.com
BulldogBreeds.com FishForums.com HavaneseForum.com SpoiledMaltese.com
CatForum.com GermanShepherds.com Labradoodle-dogs.net YorkieForum.com
Chihuahua-People.com RetrieverBreeds.com